BWC/AHG 21/Working Papers 428 - 437: Project on Strengthening the Biological and Toxin Weapons Convention, Working Papers, Department of Peace Studies, University of Bradford.

WP.437 Working paper submitted by Australia PRACTICE RANDOMLY-SELECTED TRANSPARENCY VISIT TO A BIODEFENCE FACILITY

WP.436 Working paper submitted by the United States of America IMPACT ON DECLARATIONS, VISITED STATE PARTY, AND RECEIVING STATE PARTY WHEN A HOST NATION IS INVOLVED

WP.435 Working Paper submitted by Spain ARTICLE III SECTION D

WP.434 Working paper submitted by the Islamic Republic of Iran Technical justification for limited size of the Area of Investigation

WP.433 Working paper submitted by New Zealand and South Africa SELECTION METHODOLOGIES FOR RANDOM VISITS

WP.432ad1 WORKING PAPER SUBMITTED BY CHINA, CUBA, INDIA, INDONESIA, THE ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN, MEXICO AND PAKISTAN Addendum

WP.432 Working paper submitted by China, Cuba, India, Indonesia, the Islamic Republic of Iran, Mexico and Pakistan

WP.431 Working paper submitted by Italy, Pakistan and Poland ARTICLE IX THE ORGANIZATION

WP.430 Working paper submitted by South Africa IMPLICATIONS OF THE ANNEXES AND APPENDICES BEING SUBJECT TO RESERVATIONS

WP.429 WORKING PAPER SUBMITTED BY THE FRIEND OF THE CHAIR ON THE SEAT OF THE ORGANIZATION CONTAINING THE REPLY RECEIVED FROM SWITZERLAND ON 13 OCTOBER 2000 TO THE QUESTIONNAIRE ON POSSIBLE ARRANGEMENTS REGARDING THE SEAT OF THE BWC ORGANIZATION AND GENERAL INFORMATION ON THE HOST CITY

WP.428 WORKING PAPER SUBMITTED BY THE FRIEND OF THE CHAIR ON THE SEAT OF THE ORGANIZATION CONTAINING THE REPLY RECEIVED FROM THE NETHERLANDS ON 13 OCTOBER 2000 TO THE QUESTIONNAIRE ON POSSIBLE ARRANGEMENTS REGARDING THE SEAT OF THE BWC ORGANIZATION AND GENERAL INFORMATION ON THE HOST CITY. This document has been reproduced as an HTML file. Some of the origianal formatting has been lost. Please check this version against the orignal for authenticity.

WP.437	Working paper submitted by Australia PRACTICE RANDOMLY-SELECTED TRANSPARENCY VISIT TO A BIODEFENCE FACILITY
WP.436	Working paper submitted by the United States of America IMPACT ON DECLARATIONS, VISITED STATE PARTY, AND RECEIVING STATE PARTY WHEN A HOST NATION IS INVOLVED
WP.435	Working Paper submitted by Spain ARTICLE III SECTION D
WP.434	Working paper submitted by the Islamic Republic of Iran Technical justification for limited size of the Area of Investigation
WP.433	Working paper submitted by New Zealand and South Africa SELECTION METHODOLOGIES FOR RANDOM VISITS
WP.432ad1	WORKING PAPER SUBMITTED BY CHINA, CUBA, INDIA, INDONESIA, THE ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN, MEXICO AND PAKISTAN Addendum
WP.432	Working paper submitted by China, Cuba, India, Indonesia, the Islamic Republic of Iran, Mexico and Pakistan
WP.431	Working paper submitted by Italy, Pakistan and Poland ARTICLE IX THE ORGANIZATION
WP.430	Working paper submitted by South Africa IMPLICATIONS OF THE ANNEXES AND APPENDICES BEING SUBJECT TO RESERVATIONS
WP.429	WORKING PAPER SUBMITTED BY THE FRIEND OF THE CHAIR ON THE SEAT OF THE ORGANIZATION CONTAINING THE REPLY RECEIVED FROM SWITZERLAND ON 13 OCTOBER 2000 TO THE QUESTIONNAIRE ON POSSIBLE ARRANGEMENTS REGARDING THE SEAT OF THE BWC ORGANIZATION AND GENERAL INFORMATION ON THE HOST CITY
WP.428	WORKING PAPER SUBMITTED BY THE FRIEND OF THE CHAIR ON THE SEAT OF THE ORGANIZATION CONTAINING THE REPLY RECEIVED FROM THE NETHERLANDS ON 13 OCTOBER 2000 TO THE QUESTIONNAIRE ON POSSIBLE ARRANGEMENTS REGARDING THE SEAT OF THE BWC ORGANIZATION AND GENERAL INFORMATION ON THE HOST CITY. This document has been reproduced as an HTML file. Some of the origianal formatting has been lost. Please check this version against the orignal for authenticity.